Back to the radar Projects, PMO and Risk

Evidence the PMO Needs Is Before the Decision, Not After

Every strategy runs on a bet. The money, people, and technology behind it will carry it through. Most executives don’t trust that bet. Economist Impact research commissioned by Planview found that only 20% of executives are confident in the financial, human, and technological resources allocated to strategy implementat…

Every strategy runs on a bet. The money, people, and technology behind it will carry it through. Most executives don’t trust that bet. Economist Impact research commissioned by Planview found that only 20% of executives are confident in the financial, human, and technological resources allocated to strategy implementat…

In context

  • Topic: Proyectos, PMO y Riesgos — Gestión de proyectos, oficinas de proyecto y riesgo del portafolio.
  • Source: Planview
  • Published: 14/10/2026

Continue reading at the original source →

Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.

Why it matters

A project management office is worth the decisions it makes possible, not the reports it produces. Once the PMO becomes the function chasing status updates, it has already lost: the team learns to fill in the template and the real information goes back to travelling through the corridors.

My filter is the quality of the status report. If every project is green, the reporting system is not working: in any real portfolio some initiatives are in trouble, and a healthy organisation surfaces them in time rather than discovering them at the closure committee.

What usually goes wrong

What I see fail most is the absent sponsor. They sign the kick-off, appear in the photo, and do not come back until there is a problem. Without somebody with real authority clearing obstacles every fortnight, the project manager ends up negotiating as an equal with areas that do not report to them, and loses.

What to watch

  • How it was estimated and how close the same organisation's previous estimates turned out to be.
  • Who the sponsor is and how often they actually show up — not on the org chart, in the calendar.
  • Whether the status report shows any red projects: an all-green portfolio is a portfolio without information.

How I read this entry

I would use it to review how the organisation estimates. If historical estimates were systematically out by half and nobody adjusted the method, no project will land well: you are planning with a ruler that measures short and blaming the team for not reaching the mark.

This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Share
Source. Planview

Comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Plain text only, no links. No email is requested. Comments are reviewed before they are published.

Living through this in your own team?

Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.

Keep reading

More entries from the radar

See all
Darinel Ortega Online · I reply during the day
Today
Hello. I'm not selling anything here: this is for exchanging knowledge about technology.
Write whatever you like — you can send text, images or documents. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.
You are writing outside working hours. I will read you as soon as the day starts.

An open conversation to share knowledge. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

Let us book a conversation

Pick the day and time that work for you. Thirty minutes, no sales pitch.

Video call

For a video call, just ask for one here and I'll send you the session link.