Back to the radar Cybersecurity

Chainguard Launches Secure Workspaces and Checks for AI Coding Agents

Software supply chain security company Chainguard has announced two beta products for running and testing code written by developers and AI agents. Chainguard Workspaces provides remote development environments based on hardened microVMs, while Chainguard Checks moves continuous integration into the development loop.

Software supply chain security company Chainguard has announced two beta products for running and testing code written by developers and AI agents. Chainguard Workspaces provides remote development environments based on hardened microVMs, while Chainguard Checks moves continuous integration into the development loop.

In context

  • Topic: Ciberseguridad — Riesgo, identidad, respuesta a incidentes y cumplimiento.
  • Source: InfoQ
  • Published: 16/10/2026

Continue reading at the original source →

Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.

Why it matters

In security the story is rarely the attack. It is the time between the intrusion and somebody noticing. That number says more about an organisation than any certificate hanging on the reception wall.

I read it with the same short list as always: second factor on anything that grants access, tested backups kept off the network, and a real inventory of what is exposed to the internet. It is not glamorous, and it still prevents most disasters.

What usually goes wrong

What I see fail most is the backup. It is configured, it runs every night, nobody checks it. The day you need to restore, it turns out it had been failing silently for four months, or that everything was backed up except exactly what was needed. A backup never restored is an assumption.

What to watch

  • How it was communicated to customers and regulators, which is where reputational cost is decided.
  • Whether third parties or suppliers were in the chain, because the perimeter now includes partners.
  • How long it took to detect, usually the most revealing metric in the whole case.

How I read this entry

I would use it for a conversation with the board, not with the technical team. The question you must be able to answer there is how long the business can operate without its systems and what each day of that outage costs. With that number, the security budget gets discussed differently.

This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Share
Source. InfoQ

Comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Plain text only, no links. No email is requested. Comments are reviewed before they are published.

Living through this in your own team?

Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.

Keep reading

More entries from the radar

See all
Darinel Ortega Online · I reply during the day
Today
Hello. I'm not selling anything here: this is for exchanging knowledge about technology.
Write whatever you like — you can send text, images or documents. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

An open conversation to share knowledge. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

Let us book a conversation

Pick the day and time that work for you. Thirty minutes, no sales pitch.

Video call

For a video call, just ask for one here and I'll send you the session link.